Maybe the old structured design notations such as data flow diagrams  
etc would be easier to adapt to
FP than UML. Just a thought since it mainly dealt with functions and  
tying them together.

Just my two cents.


Alwyn Goodloe




On Aug 16, 2005, at 1:06 PM, Jonathan Bryant wrote:

> I'm not trying to bring up a subject that we have already beat to  
> death,
> so I'll keep my focus narrow :).
>
> Is there an equivalent of UML for functional languages?  Or is it  
> maybe
> possible to use UML in some specific way to denote functional  
> concepts?
> I know that OCaml supports OO programming, but this is specific to the
> non-OO paradigm...
>
> --Jonathan
>
> -- 
> *=========================*
> |Jonathan Bryant          |
> |Valdosta State University|
> |Information Technology   |
> |System Operations        |
> |-------------------------|
> |jtbryant@valdosta.edu    |
> |x6358                    |
> *=========================*
>
> _______________________________________________
> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
> http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
> Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
>