Browse thread
[Fwd: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml for Industry]
- Ken Rose
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Ken Rose <kenrose@t...> |
| Subject: | [Fwd: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml for Industry] |
Oops. I meant to send this to the list... -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml for Industry Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 13:11:14 -0700 From: Ken Rose <kenrose@tfb.com> Reply-To: rose@acm.org To: Jon Harrop <jon@ffconsultancy.com> References: <200508011826.52882.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <200508081820.09595.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <1123523898.6848.107.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200508081935.01424.jon@ffconsultancy.com> Jon Harrop wrote: > On Monday 08 August 2005 18:58, skaller wrote: >>That is a silly conclusion IMHO. Did you really expect existing >>Ocaml experts to buy a report on use of Ocaml in industry targetted >>at MANAGERS?? > > My theory was that programmers who appreciate better languages might want some > evidence that they can present to their managers in order to help justify the > use of non-mainstream languages. I was curious to see if anyone here was in > such a position. I'm a programmer who fits that description. Unfortunately, I don't have authority to buy a box of paperclips, let alone spend 800GBP on a report. > I get the impression that most people here (like me) write OCaml code without > benefit of a manager. ;-) <raises hand> - ken