Browse thread
Does LablTk have a future?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Jon Harrop <jon@f...> |
| Subject: | Re: GUI for OCaml (was: Re: [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future?) |
On Tuesday 30 August 2005 16:33, mmzeeman wrote: > The Clean programming language seems to have a nice functional GUI api > (http://www.cs.ru.nl/~clean/index.html). Thanks for the link. I'll check it out. > Personnaly I like the Qt api. I think it should be possible to > create/generate c++ to ocaml-objects wrappers so you could create Qt GUIs > with ocaml. This is exactly the kind of thing that I'd like to avoid. Firstly, Qt is a very expensive commercial product so we wouldn't use it. Secondly, Qt goes to great lengths to circumvent flaws in the C++ language. It would be a great shame to "port" these to OCaml. Finally, I found that TrollTech's own Qt demos segfault reliably, so I'd question Qt's stability. I'd much rather see only low-level bindings with all of the widget code written in OCaml. -- Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. Objective CAML for Scientists http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists