Browse thread
Does LablTk have a future?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Yaron Minsky <yminsky@g...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future? |
On 8/30/05, Matt Gushee <mgushee@havenrock.com> wrote: > > > Maybe today's OCamlers are by and large beyond needing that sort of > book. But it's kind of self-defeating to take for granted that the > status quo will continue. I'm inclined to think that as OCaml gains in > popularity--as it is certainly doing--there will be more people who need > more hand-holding. Which doesn't necessarily mean there's much of market > for a book such as I've proposed, just that I see some reason to hope. I haven't the faintest idea what the market for such a thing would be, but if a good book on using Tk from OCaml existed, I would buy it. Similarly for a Gtk/Ocaml book. y