Browse thread
Parameter evaluation order
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Christophe Raffalli <christophe.raffalli@u...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: Parameter evaluation order |
brogoff a écrit : > On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Christophe Raffalli wrote: > >>If you really want left-to-right evaluation order in ocaml, use camlp4 >>to change the syntax with a postfix function application (with the >>argument to the left). >> >>That will be homogenous with type application ! >> >>:-) > > > Alas, it doesn't help with the evaluation of order of constructors, > which is where I'd find left-to-right most helpful. One of those places > where I think SML is better, even though I usually favor efficiency > over elegance. > Anyway, I always found that the application of constructor has a syntax to near the syntax of function application: f (x,y) and A (x,y) are both meaningfull ... I would prefer square bracket for constructor application, mandatory even for unary constructor (and maybe also constant constructor then you can lift the restriction about capital letter) > -- Brian >