[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Damien Doligez <damien.doligez@i...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Syntax vs Operators |
On Aug 23, 2005, at 20:05, Jacques Carette wrote: > Actually, the whole point of this question is that I want to > redefine/override them > - and I wanted to find out which I could not. I know I can > override + if I want, > I want to know about the ones like :: which have a pre-defined > meaning but can not > be overridden. Maybe I'm overlooking something, but I think the ones in the "keywords" list are the ones that you cannot or should not override. > The point is to see how much of a DSL I can create in Ocaml, using > Ocaml syntax, > by using lots of Functors. Very much in the spirit of the Lua-ML > interpreter in > fact, except that I want to use Caml syntax rather than having to > parse a new > language. If it's a DSL that includes OCaml as a sublanguage, I think at some point you will have users who want to use the OCaml features that you are hiding. -- Damien