Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
Does LablTk have a future?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Matt Gushee <mgushee@h...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future?
Francois Rouaix wrote:

> I'm not active in the LablTk or CamlTk community anymore, but as the 
> writer of the (probably) largest piece of CamlTk code lying around (the 
> MMM browser), I want to let you know to feel free to pilfer code from 
> MMM, if useful or relevant.

Thanks!

> Also, you mention "extra Tcl" commands such as "after". I remember after 
> and timers to be present in CamlTk. Maybe they weren't ported to LablTk.

Yes, I think that's right. I wrote an app about a year ago that needed 
'after'. Though for some reason I can't recall, I didn't want to use the 
CamlTk version verbatim, I did model my implementation after it.

--
Matt Gushee
Englewood, CO, USA