Browse thread
Does LablTk have a future?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Matt Gushee <mgushee@h...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future? |
Francois Rouaix wrote: > I'm not active in the LablTk or CamlTk community anymore, but as the > writer of the (probably) largest piece of CamlTk code lying around (the > MMM browser), I want to let you know to feel free to pilfer code from > MMM, if useful or relevant. Thanks! > Also, you mention "extra Tcl" commands such as "after". I remember after > and timers to be present in CamlTk. Maybe they weren't ported to LablTk. Yes, I think that's right. I wrote an app about a year ago that needed 'after'. Though for some reason I can't recall, I didn't want to use the CamlTk version verbatim, I did model my implementation after it. -- Matt Gushee Englewood, CO, USA