Browse thread
Does LablTk have a future?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Jon Harrop <jon@f...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future? |
I had better clarify before continuing. I see two viable approaches here: 1. Write OCaml bindings to the native GUIs and then an OCaml wrapper that abstracts the nativeness away. 2. Write a new widget toolkit designed to render via OpenGL. On Tuesday 30 August 2005 18:47, David Thomas wrote: > ... If we do (1) then it will handle skinning and the intersection of the sets of functionality of the native GUIs. If we do (2) then customisation and skinning will be ignored but you have the advantage of real time 2D and 3D graphics. Option (2) seems much easier and more useful to me. I've never cared about skinning... -- Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. Objective CAML for Scientists http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists