Browse thread
Does LablTk have a future?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Jon Harrop <jon@f...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future? |
On Tuesday 30 August 2005 16:47, David MENTRE wrote: > 2005/8/30, Jon Harrop <jon@ffconsultancy.com>: > > Why do you think that? > > Hmm. I thought that making postscript or pdf output of an OpenGL > document is difficult, but apparently I'm wrong. Yes, generating PS from OpenGL is very easy (I've done a lot of work on this for Presenta, of course). > > Yes but we gain the ability to have a better interface on all platforms. > > Well, "better" is rather subjective. And not having the native > interface means that people will say "oh, look, this is a non-standard > OCaml program" instead on looking at the application itself. True. I think this is the lesser of evils though. > That's said, if we can have a nice (to be defined ;-) OCaml GUI > toolkit, cross-platform and well documented, we a minimal set of tools > to help design interfaces, I would seriously consider its use. Absolutely. Me too. > > Also, we'd need the library to be free for commercial use. > > I'm usually a proponent of GPL but for such a toolkit, I wouldn't mind > a LGPL or BSD-like license. If it is OCaml then it will have to be statically compiled in, so you'd need that LGPL get-out clause. > I have created a Google group to discuss this: > Homepage: http://groups.google.com/group/ocaml-gui > Group email: ocaml-gui@googlegroups.com > Description: Mailing list to discuss design and development of a > cross-platform Graphic User Interface for the OCaml language I'll cross post this message... -- Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. Objective CAML for Scientists http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists