Christophe Raffalli wrote:

> I would prefer a GUI programming language (similar to TeX for word 
> processing). This might be easier to develop, can either be static 
> (the widget build at compile time) or dynamic, and most of all, it is 
> easier to modify an existing GUI.
>
What about re-using the work from Mozilla - I mean Gecko and XUL.  See 
the links on http://www.mozilla.org/projects/.  It should be relatively 
simple to create a human-friendly syntax for it, so I don't think that 
XML is a real issue.

Jacques