Browse thread
Does LablTk have a future?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | David MENTRE <david.mentre@g...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Does LablTk have a future? |
Jon, 2005/8/30, Jon Harrop <jon@ffconsultancy.com>: > > [me] > > Because printing and PDF rendering is not easy. > > Why do you think that? Hmm. I thought that making postscript or pdf output of an OpenGL document is difficult, but apparently I'm wrong. > > And because you loose > > the ability to have native interface on all paltforms (Gnome, KDE, > > Windows 2k, Windows XP, MacOS X, ...). > > Yes but we gain the ability to have a better interface on all platforms. Well, "better" is rather subjective. And not having the native interface means that people will say "oh, look, this is a non-standard OCaml program" instead on looking at the application itself. That's said, if we can have a nice (to be defined ;-) OCaml GUI toolkit, cross-platform and well documented, we a minimal set of tools to help design interfaces, I would seriously consider its use. > Also, we'd need the library to be free for commercial use. I'm usually a proponent of GPL but for such a toolkit, I wouldn't mind a LGPL or BSD-like license. I have created a Google group to discuss this: Homepage: http://groups.google.com/group/ocaml-gui Group email: ocaml-gui@googlegroups.com Description: Mailing list to discuss design and development of a cross-platform Graphic User Interface for the OCaml language Yours, d.