On Friday 09 September 2005 16:01, Paul Snively wrote:
> Hi Jon!
>
> First: I love the book. :-)

Thank you! :-)

> Sounds like <http://oops.tercom.ru/dml> to me, or maybe even <http://
> www.metaocaml.org>.

I believe the former has been dead for some time. MetaOCaml is still alive and 
kicking though. I studied it in some detail but somehow managed to forget 
about it now...

> > Does the OCaml distribution expose everything needed to do this?
>
> No.

Damn.

A ".cmo" is just a marshalled data structure though, right? So could I spit 
those out and then dynlink them back in?

> I really do think either Dynamic Caml or MetaOCaml will be what you
> want.

I'll have a play with MetaOCaml.

> "What happens when you try it?" ;-)

I'll keep you posted. :-)

-- 
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
Objective CAML for Scientists
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists