Browse thread
Does LablTk have a future?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Richard Jones <rich@a...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: Feeding the OCaml GUI troll |
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 10:39:41PM +1000, skaller wrote: > The fact the control inverted (event driven) form > is object oriented/procedural, yet equivalent to > a purely functional algorithm, makes mechanical > control inversion attractive -- but the utility > is only apparent in more complex examples. Another good example where it makes sense is in writing web servers. Have a look at the source to (event-driven webserver) BOA sometime - it's absolutely horrible. Rich. -- Richard Jones, CTO Merjis Ltd. Merjis - web marketing and technology - http://merjis.com Team Notepad - intranets and extranets for business - http://team-notepad.com