Browse thread
Efficiency of let/and
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2005-09-26 (17:33) |
From: | David McClain <dmcclain1@m...> |
Subject: | Re: Ant: [Caml-list] Efficiency of let/and |
I have understood that the "and" syntax was needed to support the creation of mutually recursive bindings. While it can also be used as a form of "parallel let" within a function definition, it is vitally important for the mutual recursion case. - David McClain, Tucson, AZ, USA