Browse thread
Efficiency of let/and
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Fernando Alegre <fernando@c...> |
| Subject: | Re: Ant: [Caml-list] Efficiency of let/and |
There is a small advantage in using "and" instead of "in let": # let () = let x = 2 and x = 5 in ();; This variable is bound several times in this matching # let () = let x = 2 in let x = 5 in ();; Probably the second "x" should have been a "y"... so the compiler catches that mistake. Fernando > > let a = expr1 > > and b = expr2 > > in > > ... > > > > rather than: > > let a = expr1 in > > let b = expr2 in > > > > So my question is: is there any value (other than > > the documentation value) > > in doing this?