Browse thread
Compiling to OCaml bytecode
- Jon Harrop
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2005-09-09 (12:43) |
From: | Jon Harrop <jon@f...> |
Subject: | Compiling to OCaml bytecode |
I am interested in improving the performance of a simple term-level interpreter. As OCaml's bytecode is so fast, I'd like to replace the interpreter with a JIT compiler that compiles to OCaml bytecode and then uses OCaml's bytecode interpreter to execute the generated code efficiently and handle the results. Does the OCaml distribution expose everything needed to do this? I assume the Dynlink module is where I should be looking. I've never used it before but it looks as though it only loads from file (the "loadfile" function), so I'd have to compile to a .cmo file and load that. What is the easiest way to recover the result? If the necessary functionality is not already exposed, could it and/or what are the odds that it will be added? Also, is a bytecode-compiled JIT bytecode compiler likely to outperform a native-code-compiled term-level interpreter? I assume the JIT compiler would itself need to be compiled to bytecode in order to provide the bytecode interpreter for the generated code. -- Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. Objective CAML for Scientists http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists