Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] The Caml morale crasher #1
- yoann padioleau
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2005-09-08 (12:55) |
From: | yoann padioleau <padator@w...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] The Caml morale crasher #1 |
> * Damien Guichard: > > > When annoucing an OCaml project on a public forum i have been > > advised to renunce lambdas because it would impede translation to "a > > less obscure, more popular language". > > Most languages offer strictly downward closures. Even GCC's C > implementation has them. 8-) Again I think I will disagree on the choice of your words :) GCC has nested functions. I think that we can't call that a closure; a closure is something that close his environment and store it somewhere. There is no such thing in GCC I think. > > _______________________________________________ > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: > http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list > Archives: http://caml.inria.fr > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs > >