Browse thread
Efficiency of let/and
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Jon Harrop <jon@f...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Efficiency of let/and |
On Sunday 25 September 2005 14:31, Brian Hurt wrote: > So my question is: is there any value (other than the documentation value) > in doing this? Good question. I've no idea. However, I did notice that this change has been undone (i.e. to use "let" twice and not "and") in the stdlib. -- Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. Objective CAML for Scientists http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists