Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
Avoiding shared data
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2005-10-04 (23:18)
From: Jon Harrop <jon@f...>
Subject: Re: FP/IP and performance (in general) and Patterns... (Re: [Caml-list] Avoiding shared data)
On Tuesday 04 October 2005 23:39, Christopher A. Watford wrote:
> This list is best for asking OCaml questions and is awful for asking
> for what language is best for what, nobody agrees.

Oliver was asking which of three programming paradigms is best under different 
circumstances. OCaml provides all three so I think this can be taken as an 
OCaml-specific question and is fine for this list.

I for one would be very interested in reading information on this. I'll check 
out the design patterns paper - thanks Michael.

My impression is that:

1. Data structure heavy code is often easier to write in a functional style. 
See the "n"th-nearest neighbour example from my book:

2. GUI code is more easily written with a stateful imperative front and often 
a functional back end.

I have yet to really exploit OCaml's OO capabilities.

Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
Objective CAML for Scientists