Browse thread
Ray tracer language comparison
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | sejourne_kevin <sejourne_kevin@y...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: Ray tracer language comparison |
Gerd Stolpmann a écrit : > Am Sonntag, den 09.10.2005, 10:53 -0400 schrieb Vincenzo Ciancia: > >>Thomas Fischbacher wrote: >> >> >>>As you may have seen from my initial reply to that posting, I originally >>>was quite sceptical. However, I had a somewhat lengthy PM conversation >>>with Dr. Jon Harrop where he kindly and patiently explained to me his >>>methodology and findings, and eventually, this inspired me to contribute >>>another benchmark (which I did of my own) to this comparison. >> >>What is the difference, that you mention in your webpage, between "OCaml" >>and "Objective Caml"? It's not clear to me what your benchmark is about at >>all :) > > > I guess it's a joke. OCaml = the speed-optimized version; Objective Caml > = the version optimized for readability (which I don't agree with). Without colors, it is the same for the two programs... unreadable at all. ___________________________________________________________________________ Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger Téléchargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com