Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
Ray tracer language comparison
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: sejourne_kevin <sejourne_kevin@y...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Ray tracer language comparison
Gerd Stolpmann a écrit :
> Am Sonntag, den 09.10.2005, 10:53 -0400 schrieb Vincenzo Ciancia:
>>Thomas Fischbacher wrote:
>>>As you may have seen from my initial reply to that posting, I originally
>>>was quite sceptical. However, I had a somewhat lengthy PM conversation
>>>with Dr. Jon Harrop where he kindly and patiently explained to me his
>>>methodology and findings, and eventually, this inspired me to contribute
>>>another benchmark (which I did of my own) to this comparison.
>>What is the difference, that you mention in your webpage, between "OCaml"
>>and "Objective Caml"? It's not clear to me what your benchmark is about at
>>all :)
> I guess it's a joke. OCaml = the speed-optimized version; Objective Caml
> = the version optimized for readability (which I don't agree with).
Without colors, it is the same for the two programs... unreadable at all.


Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger 
Téléchargez cette version sur