Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
Ray tracer language comparison
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: sejourne_kevin <sejourne_kevin@y...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Ray tracer language comparison
Gerd Stolpmann a écrit :
> Am Sonntag, den 09.10.2005, 10:53 -0400 schrieb Vincenzo Ciancia:
> 
>>Thomas Fischbacher wrote:
>>
>>
>>>As you may have seen from my initial reply to that posting, I originally
>>>was quite sceptical. However, I had a somewhat lengthy PM conversation
>>>with Dr. Jon Harrop where he kindly and patiently explained to me his
>>>methodology and findings, and eventually, this inspired me to contribute
>>>another benchmark (which I did of my own) to this comparison.
>>
>>What is the difference, that you mention in your webpage, between "OCaml"
>>and "Objective Caml"? It's not clear to me what your benchmark is about at
>>all :)
> 
> 
> I guess it's a joke. OCaml = the speed-optimized version; Objective Caml
> = the version optimized for readability (which I don't agree with).
Without colors, it is the same for the two programs... unreadable at all.

	

	
		
___________________________________________________________________________ 
Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger 
Téléchargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com