[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Alain Frisch <Alain.Frisch@i...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] equality of Big_ints |
skaller wrote: > The reason may be because the equality of integers > isn't the same as algebraic equality of the data structures: Indeed, but this is not about maintaining an invariant. Because of the representation of Big_int.big_int as a pair (sign,absolute value), the polymorphic comparison would give (-1) < (-2) if the custom comparison were used for Nat.nat. -- Alain