Browse thread
Ray tracer language comparison
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Florian Weimer <fw@d...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Ray tracer language comparison |
* Thomas Fischbacher: > I just extended my analysis by another implementation in yet another > language. This time, it's "Steel Bank Common Lisp". Is this some kind of elaborate hoax? If it is, I don't get it? "OCaml" vs. "Objective Caml", "SBCL" vs. "Steel Bank Common Lisp", "1/8" vs. "1/10" -- all these comparisons are a bit strange.