Browse thread
OCaml efficiency/optimization?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Tato Thetza <thetza@s...> |
| Subject: | Re: OCaml efficiency/optimization? |
sorry I meant Ocaml for Experienced Programmers: http://www.bogonomicon.com/bblog/book/html/book1.html On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 03:21:43 -0700, "Tato Thetza" <thetza@sent.com> said: > I've been reading over > http://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/manual-ocaml/index.html and have learned > two things: > -lists are immutable and singly linked, which explains why 1::[2;3] is > valid while [2,3]::1 is not, and why its efficient. > -the proper way to ensure tail-recursive optimization > > question: are these and other optimizations documented somewhere > officially? I find it a little uncomfortable I've been learning OCaml > without knowning such internal details. Any secrets I should definitely > know if I were to use this language in production? > > thanks, > Tato Thetza