Browse thread
Avoiding shared data
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Martin Chabr <martin_chabr@y...> |
| Subject: | Ant: Re: Ant: Re: Ant: Re: Ant: Re: [Caml-list] Avoiding shared data |
--- skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 22:03 +0200, Martin Chabr > wrote: > > > Avoiding shared data. Why is it done that way? Who > > wants to have an array or list of identical > records or > > sub-arrays or other sub-structures which are all > > updated at the same time in the same way? > > Mutable shared data is very useful: caching is > an obvious example where this is precisely what you > want. > > -- > John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net> > Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net > > This sounds very interesting. Can you say a little more about it please? Martin ___________________________________________________________ Was denken Sie über E-Mail? Wir hören auf Ihre Meinung: http://surveylink.yahoo.com/wix/p0379378.aspx