Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
Ray tracer language comparison
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Gerd Stolpmann <info@g...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Ray tracer language comparison
Am Sonntag, den 09.10.2005, 10:53 -0400 schrieb Vincenzo Ciancia:
> Thomas Fischbacher wrote:
> 
> > 
> > As you may have seen from my initial reply to that posting, I originally
> > was quite sceptical. However, I had a somewhat lengthy PM conversation
> > with Dr. Jon Harrop where he kindly and patiently explained to me his
> > methodology and findings, and eventually, this inspired me to contribute
> > another benchmark (which I did of my own) to this comparison.
> 
> What is the difference, that you mention in your webpage, between "OCaml"
> and "Objective Caml"? It's not clear to me what your benchmark is about at
> all :)

I guess it's a joke. OCaml = the speed-optimized version; Objective Caml
= the version optimized for readability (which I don't agree with).

Gerd
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Gerd Stolpmann * Viktoriastr. 45 * 64293 Darmstadt * Germany 
gerd@gerd-stolpmann.de          http://www.gerd-stolpmann.de
Telefon: 06151/153855                  Telefax: 06151/997714
------------------------------------------------------------