Browse thread
Ray tracer language comparison
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Gerd Stolpmann <info@g...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: Ray tracer language comparison |
Am Sonntag, den 09.10.2005, 10:53 -0400 schrieb Vincenzo Ciancia: > Thomas Fischbacher wrote: > > > > > As you may have seen from my initial reply to that posting, I originally > > was quite sceptical. However, I had a somewhat lengthy PM conversation > > with Dr. Jon Harrop where he kindly and patiently explained to me his > > methodology and findings, and eventually, this inspired me to contribute > > another benchmark (which I did of my own) to this comparison. > > What is the difference, that you mention in your webpage, between "OCaml" > and "Objective Caml"? It's not clear to me what your benchmark is about at > all :) I guess it's a joke. OCaml = the speed-optimized version; Objective Caml = the version optimized for readability (which I don't agree with). Gerd -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gerd Stolpmann * Viktoriastr. 45 * 64293 Darmstadt * Germany gerd@gerd-stolpmann.de http://www.gerd-stolpmann.de Telefon: 06151/153855 Telefax: 06151/997714 ------------------------------------------------------------