Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
[Caml-list] The Bytecode Interpreter...
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Jonathan Roewen <jonathan.roewen@g...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] The Bytecode Interpreter...
> Your main problem, IMHO, will be concurrency, not interrupts.
> That is -- multiprocessor support. Because typical
> multiprocessor OS shares a lot more data between CPUs,
> and runs at least part of the kernel on ALL the CPUs.

Possibly. I think we'll tackle this by a separate kernel
instance/runtime per processor, and act like they're separate machines
.. akin to distributed programming.

But multiprocessor stuff is a long, long way off.