Browse thread
[Caml-list] The Bytecode Interpreter...
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Jonathan Roewen <jonathan.roewen@g...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] The Bytecode Interpreter... |
> Your main problem, IMHO, will be concurrency, not interrupts. > That is -- multiprocessor support. Because typical > multiprocessor OS shares a lot more data between CPUs, > and runs at least part of the kernel on ALL the CPUs. Possibly. I think we'll tackle this by a separate kernel instance/runtime per processor, and act like they're separate machines .. akin to distributed programming. But multiprocessor stuff is a long, long way off.