[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Christian Stork <cstork@i...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Using Polymorphic Variants |
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 10:43:42AM +0200, Jean-Marie Gaillourdet wrote:
> Christian Stork schrieb:
> > Basic Question:
> > Why aren't polymorphic variants coerced by default?
> I guess there is some undecidability involved.
My guess too, but I'd like to be sure. ;-)
> > I am automatically generating some code that uses polymorphic variants
> > extensively. The inferred types are very complicated. Unfortunatly, at
> > some points in my code coercions are needed for it to compile. Since I
> > don't have the types available when I generate the code (and I don't
> > think it's possible to refer to inferred types in coercions) I can't
> > coerce explicitly. I'd like to be able to say something like:
> > ... f (x: type_of_x :> type_expected_by_f) ...
> Isn't it possible to write something like that:
> (f: 'a) (x: type_of_x :> 'a)
> I didn't test that trick.
Nice idea. Let's see:
# type ab = [ `Apple | `Banana ]
type abo = [ ab | `Orange]
let f (x:abo) = match x with #ab -> "ab" | #abo -> "orange"
let a = (`Apple:ab);;
type ab = [ `Apple | `Banana ]
type abo = [ `Apple | `Banana | `Orange ]
val f : abo -> string = <fun>
val a : ab = `Apple
# f (a:>abo);;
- : string = "ab"
# (f:'a->_) (a:ab:>'a);;
Characters 10-20:
(f:'a->_) (a:ab:>'a);;
^^^^^^^^^^
Type ab = [ `Apple | `Banana ] is not a subtype of type
abo = [ `Apple | `Banana | `Orange ]
The first variant type does not allow tag(s) `Orange
# (f:'a->_) (a:>'a);;
Characters 11-12:
(f:'a->_) (a:>'a);;
^
This expression cannot be coerced to type
abo = [ `Apple | `Banana | `Orange ];
it has type ab but is here used with type abo
The first variant type does not allow tag(s) `Orange
I'm confused about the error message saying that ab is not a subtype of
abo. I thought it is...
--
Chris Stork <> Support eff.org! <> http://www.ics.uci.edu/~cstork/
OpenPGP fingerprint: B08B 602C C806 C492 D069 021E 41F3 8C8D 50F9 CA2F