On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, skaller wrote:

> My point is -- more popular languages already pollute the
> Wikipedia with considerable crap, so a well written
> description of properties of Ocaml is warranted to
> counter this rubbish -- 100KB if necessary!. IMHO. 
> 
> But not necessarily all in one place.
> 
> For example I would love if Jacques Garrigue would
> spindle, fold, and mutilate some of his notes
> on Polymorphic Variants, make a separate article
> on that, and hang a link off the main Ocaml article.

Yes, I fully agree with you.

-- 
regards,               tf@cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de              (o_
 Thomas Fischbacher -  http://www.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de/~tf  //\
(lambda (n) ((lambda (p q r) (p p q r)) (lambda (g x y)           V_/_
(if (= x 0) y (g g (- x 1) (* x y)))) n 1))                  (Debian GNU)