Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
strange behavior with record type definition
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: skaller <skaller@u...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] strange behavior with record type definition
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 11:58 +0100, Florent wrote:
> Mmhh, why do we have to use differents label names in distinct record 
> types ?

So that the type of an expression:

	{ x = 1; y = 2 }

can be determined.

-- 
John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net>
Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net