Browse thread
strange behavior with record type definition
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | 2005-11-12 (12:13) |
| From: | skaller <skaller@u...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] strange behavior with record type definition |
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 11:58 +0100, Florent wrote:
> Mmhh, why do we have to use differents label names in distinct record
> types ?
So that the type of an expression:
{ x = 1; y = 2 }
can be determined.
--
John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net>
Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net