It was my considered opinion that Jon's revisions reduced the overall
quality of the article, and therefore I reverted those parts I found
detrimental. Others may disagree; this is a natural part of the
anarchistic editorial process on Wikipedia and eventually you must
grow accustomed to having changes reverted without being offended. But
I do affirm and repeat that a community effort to improve the OCaml
article on Wikipedia would be wonderful. End of OT discussion? -Mike

On 11/3/05, Matt Gushee <matt@gushee.net> wrote:
> Kip Macy wrote:
> > This isn't on-topic for the list, and may even qualify as a troll, but I
> > think your experiences point to another fundamental deficiency of the
> > wikipedia. Why do you think that others will have more success in their
> > updates than you have?
>
> Probably no single individual will have more success, but if several
> people submit changes along similar lines, I would think the maintainers
> will at least pay attention.
>
> --
> Matt Gushee
> Englewood, CO, USA
>
> _______________________________________________
> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
> http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
> Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
>