[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2005-11-05 (21:52) |
From: | Thomas Fischbacher <Thomas.Fischbacher@P...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: [cf-user] HDCaml 0.2.0 |
On Sat, 5 Nov 2005, Tom Hawkins wrote: > OCaml and Haskell programmers have an expression: "Once it compiles, it > usually just works!" Well, at least not from my experience. This may be true as long as you do algorithmically un-interesting things, but in practice, for code that uses more involved bookkeeping, one often still has to do quite extensive debugging. Besides this, I think that HDCaml is a quite neat approach. -- regards, tf@cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de (o_ Thomas Fischbacher - http://www.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de/~tf //\ (lambda (n) ((lambda (p q r) (p p q r)) (lambda (g x y) V_/_ (if (= x 0) y (g g (- x 1) (* x y)))) n 1)) (Debian GNU)