[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2005-11-11 (13:42) |
From: | Florian Weimer <fw@d...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] No unused code linking? |
>> IMHO, each header item can be placed into the separate DATA section, so >> it's not the real problem (the frame table is). > > No it can not. The moduler header must be contiguous and not rearranged by > linker. In absence of .cmx (and name -> mangled name table) OCaml uses the > header to call functions by position. Thus, as it is now, no part of > header can be eliminated, which in reality means that almost everything, > from linkers perspective, is reachable and can not be removed by > --gc-functions. The module header oculd be generated by the linker, omitting references to unused functions (filling the place with a null pointer or something like that).