Browse thread
[1/2 OT] Indexing (and mergeable Index-algorithms)
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2005-11-17 (17:31) |
From: | skaller <skaller@u...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] [1/2 OT] Indexing (and mergeable Index-algorithms) |
On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 09:09 -0600, Brian Hurt wrote: > > On Thu, 17 Nov 2005, skaller wrote: > > > Balanced BTree guarantees extremely small constant time lookup > > for all keys. (typically 3 or 4 accesses) > > Many updates are also fast constant time. However > > the Btrees are very expensive to rebalance, and occasionally > > an update requires a global rebalancing which brings the > > world to a complete stop for a very long time. > > Not as I understand BTrees. I'm not sure what it is we disagree on. -- John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net> Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net