Browse thread
strange behavior with record type definition
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | 2005-11-12 (14:45) |
| From: | skaller <skaller@u...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] strange behavior with record type definition |
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 15:15 +0100, Michael Wohlwend wrote:
> On Saturday 12 November 2005 13:51, skaller wrote:
> > > > So that the type of an expression:
> > > >
> > > > { x = 1; y = 2 }
> > > >
> > > > can be determined.
>
> I would have no problem to write in these situations Type1.{ x = 1 } or
> Type2.{x = 2} , I think there exists camlp4 program for this.
This looks quite a nice solution to me (though I prefer builtin
syntax not camlp4). Anyone see any problems with it?
--
John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net>
Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net