Jonathan Roewen wrote:
> Another option, that I'm curious what people might think of, that
> might alleviate some performance woes of multiple calls to much
> simpler MMX instruction wrappers:
> 
> A runtime code generator, that's typed by ocaml. Basically, create a
> code block from multiple instructions, which is turned into machine
> code, then executed through a C function.

Wouldn't this be the perfect scenario to leverage the power of multistage 
programming. I wonder if MetaOcaml is the right solution. And I wonder I how 
much work would go into adapting the DST to MetaOcaml...

Alex