Browse thread
The best way to circumvent the lack of Thread.kill ?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2005-11-02 (15:07) |
From: | Gerd Stolpmann <info@g...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] The best way to circumvent the lack of Thread.kill ? |
Am Mittwoch, den 02.11.2005, 15:32 +0100 schrieb Julien Narboux: > > > >There is a hack that works (Xavier forgive): > > > > > I just implemented your hack in drgeocaml, it works fine ! (under linux > at least , I have not tested on Windows yet) I think it works under Windows, too, although not tested. The way threads are implemented is basically the same. From reading the sources, I only saw that under Windows Sys.sigterm is used instead of Sys.sigvtalrm, maybe this is a special kind of joke. (Note that this type of signal is purely virtual, i.e. not routed over the OS, so it does not matter that Windows has no signals.) Gerd -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gerd Stolpmann * Viktoriastr. 45 * 64293 Darmstadt * Germany gerd@gerd-stolpmann.de http://www.gerd-stolpmann.de Telefon: 06151/153855 Telefax: 06151/997714 ------------------------------------------------------------