Browse thread
[Caml-list] Building a custom compiler environment
-
Jonathan Roewen
-
Jonathan Roewen
-
Gerd Stolpmann
-
Jonathan Roewen
- Jonathan Roewen
-
Jonathan Roewen
-
Gerd Stolpmann
-
Jonathan Roewen
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2005-11-14 (22:36) |
From: | Jonathan Roewen <jonathan.roewen@g...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Building a custom compiler environment |
I also need to ask: why are the primitives built INTO the compiler? Is there any sound explanation for this? One reason I could think of is to force the linker to keep those symbols in the final output file (when using -output-obj). But if they're not used, then why do they need to be present? For Dynlink to work correctly? This seems to be the -one- thing to make building my custom compiler environment not work without requiring a customised ocamlc (with less primitives builtin). Jonathan