Browse thread
Bigarray question
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2005-11-28 (10:09) |
From: | Dmitry Bely <dbely@m...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Bigarray question |
Thomas Fischbacher <Thomas.Fischbacher@Physik.Uni-Muenchen.DE> writes: >> > As far as I can see from the documentation, it is not explicitly permitted >> > to change a once allocated bigarray data structure in such a way that one >> > replaces the data pointer by some other data pointer (while retaining >> > size and type). This would, however, be quite useful in some situations. >> >> Is your bigarray a wrapper around some externally allocated data, created >> via alloc_bigarray() C call? > > It's a somewhat special case of just that situation, yes. > > I supposed I may just do so, however, the specification (documentation) > does not give me any guarantee that this is valid, so, at least the > documentation has to be changed before I can rely on this. 1. For the current implementation it's safe (use Data_bigarray_val(v) to change the data pointer). I don't see any reason why it could become unsafe. 2. It is up to you whether to use this feature or not. > There is a subtle difference between "just accidentally works" > and "works because it is guaranteed by specification". OCaml is a developing language, so IMHO nobody guarantees that nothing will change in the future. - Dmitry Bely