Browse thread
Impact of French DADVSI law on Free Software and OCaml (was: Re: [Caml-list] Slashdot)
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2005-12-07 (08:10) |
From: | Nicolas Cannasse <ncannasse@m...> |
Subject: | Re: Impact of French DADVSI law on Free Software and OCaml (was: Re: [Caml-list] Slashdot) |
> In English, it means that *any* software, *any* database and *any* > sound, image, etc. should be legally registred to the French State > (/dépôt légal/) as soon as it is made available to the public. I'm not > a lawyer so I might have missed something but, if this is true, (1) it > is utterly stupid and (2) it could impact the development of Free > Software in France. Should Xavier Leroy et al. registred OCaml each > time a new release is made? Should we declare all the images on the > OCaml web site? Should the OCaml bug database be registred? > > Personally, I'm worried. I'm not sure if it's the good place to talk about this, but here's my thoughts. If the law proposal was possible to apply, I would be worried. The fact that it's simply impossible to apply it in practice make it void (which is not "unit" :). Also, it might even be anticonstitutional since OS programs are words , just like news articles for instance. I'm not a lawyer but I think we shouldn't be worried about this. Nicolas