Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
yacc question
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: skaller <skaller@u...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] yacc question
On Sun, 2005-12-04 at 16:03 +0100, Robert W. wrote:

> ocamlyacc parses longest match by default.
> Your rule for atoms seem to complex or you lexer isn't able to extract
> the token for atoms correctly from the line.

When I parse atoms only, it all works fine. The problem
is that if the user specifies a production like:

#statement select expr within statement ;

then if I parse 'expr' with 'atom' this will not be allowed:

select 1 + 2 within print x;

because '1 + 2' isn't an atom. The user would be forced to write:

select (1 + 2) within print x;

But if I parse with 'expr' instead of atom,
the parse fails when it hits the unknown symbol 'within'.

> >   | expr token_not_allowed_in_expressions
> > 
> > and then 'put back' the trailing token into the buffer.
> > Is there another way?
> > 
> This shouldn't be necessary, normally you can redesign your parser
> rules to avoid this.

The problem is I'm trying to add 'on the fly' user 
defined grammar productions -- so the 'grammar' is 
extensible. This will be done by recursive descent,
but hooked inside, and hooking, the existing ocamlyacc
grammar.

-- 
John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net>
Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net