Browse thread
partial application warning unreliable?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2005-12-08 (23:51) |
From: | malc <malc@p...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] partial application warning unreliable? |
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Jacques Garrigue wrote: <snip> > > # class cc = object (self) > method f x y = x + y > method g () = self#f 1; > end;; > class cc : > object method f : int -> int -> int method g : unit -> int -> int end > > No warning, for the reason stated above: the semicolon does nothing. Here's a strange test case, i was bitten by it recently in a real code: <mox.ml> let y o = o#moo; 1 let x (o:(<moo : string -> unit>)) = y o let _ = print_int (x (object method moo s = print_endline s end)); print_newline () </mox.ml> # ocaml -warn-error A mox.ml 1 In my case method moo was actually a method that locked a mutex, the implications were quite severe. -- mailto:malc@pulsesoft.com