[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2005-12-01 (16:26) |
From: | Remi Vanicat <remi.vanicat@g...> |
Subject: | [Caml-list] printf format strings |
005/12/1, Hendrik Tews <tews@tcs.inf.tu-dresden.de>: > Jonathan Roewen <jonathan.roewen@gmail.com> writes: > > { fmt %}: convert a format string argument. The argument must have the > same type as the internal format string fmt. > > And how to use it? I get Bad format `%{' in the toplevel. > > My toplevel accepts it, but does nothing on it: > > # Printf.printf "%{%d%s%}" "kkkk\n" ;; > This expression has type > (int -> string -> 'a, 'b, 'c, int -> string -> 'a) format4 > but is here used with type (int -> string -> 'a, 'b, 'c, 'a) format4 > > This is expected, because kkkk has the wrong type. > > # Printf.printf "%{%d%s%}" "kk%dkk%s\n" ;; > - : unit = <unknown constructor> > > This should print something I guess. The "unknown constructor" > looks very suspicious. Maybe the %{ format is meant to generate > random strings??? Well, I've guessed a bug in the type system, and it seem I'm correct: let t = Obj.repr (Printf.printf "%{%d%s%}" "kk%dkk%s\n");; # Obj.is_block t;; - : bool = true # Obj.is_block (Obj.repr ());; - : bool = false # Obj.tag t;; - : int = 247 # Obj.closure_tag;; - : int = 247 So this is a closure, so a function that should have a functional type. I've tried to play with the devil, and here my result : # (Obj.magic( Printf.printf "%{%d%s%}" "kk%dkk%s\n") 5 "rae" () : unit );; %i%s- : unit = () Very strange indeed. Well, this should be reported in the bug tracking system.