Browse thread
partial application warning unreliable?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2005-12-08 (14:41) |
From: | Damien Doligez <damien.doligez@i...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] partial application warning unreliable? |
On Dec 8, 2005, at 08:11, skaller wrote: > BTW: the error flags documentation is very confusing: > > A/a enable/disable all warnings > X/x enable/disable all other warnings > > other than what? Other than [B-WYZ], obviously. There's only so much you can write in the on-line help message before people stop reading it altogether. > I am using -w yz but STILL get > warning X, unused function argument .. some of this > happens in Frontc/CIL which I'm using and I would like > to minimise patches. Warnings are orthogonal: disabling Y and Z does not disable X. It has no impact on X. > BTW: what is this for? > > S/s enable/disable non-unit statement IIRC, it's for non-unit statements that are not partial applications. > If I turn off F, will I get S instead? Warnings are orthogonal: disabling F does not make you get more S warnings. It has no impact on S. -- Damien