Browse thread
Reporting on sucess/failure of tail recursion
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2005-12-02 (09:25) |
From: | Erik de Castro Lopo <ocaml-erikd@m...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Reporting on sucess/failure of tail recursion |
Jonathan Roewen wrote: > I would love this feature! I was thinking about mentioning some > two-three days ago myself ;-) I've been wanting this for at least the last 6 months. > Even cooler would be if a tool could suggest an alternative > implementation that is tail-rec if can be made so. That might be asking a bit much :-). Erik -- +-----------------------------------------------------------+ Erik de Castro Lopo +-----------------------------------------------------------+ "Or here's an even simpler indicator of how much C++ sucks: Print out the C++ Public Review Document. Have someone hold it about three feet above your head and then drop it. Thus you will be enlightened." -- Thant Tessman