Browse thread
Best way to choose an implementation of a lib ?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Christophe Raffalli <christophe.raffalli@u...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Best way to choose an implementation of a lib ? |
Eric Cooper a écrit : > On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 09:19:30PM +0900, Jacques Garrigue wrote: > >>From: Christophe Raffalli <christophe.raffalli@univ-savoie.fr> >> >>>Let say I want two distribute two(or more) implementations of a library >>>with the .mli for all ... >>> >>>Is there a way to choose the implementation at link time ? >>>[...] >> >>Directories seem a possible solution. >>[...] >>An alternative to distinct directories is to create libraries (.cma/.cmxa). > > > And yet another is to use symbolic links, for example > a.ml -> a_optimized_impl.ml > or > a.ml -> a_reference_impl.ml > This is not reasonable for a library. You can not ask the user to change symbolic link in /usr/lib/ocaml ... > (Note that when using "make", you have to be careful about stale > object files after switching the symlink. It's a good idea to do a > "make clean" at the same time.) > -- Christophe Raffalli Université de Savoie Batiment Le Chablais, bureau 21 73376 Le Bourget-du-Lac Cedex tél: (33) 4 79 75 81 03 fax: (33) 4 79 75 87 42 mail: Christophe.Raffalli@univ-savoie.fr www: http://www.lama.univ-savoie.fr/~RAFFALLI --------------------------------------------- IMPORTANT: this mail is signed using PGP/MIME At least Enigmail/Mozilla, mutt or evolution can check this signature. The public key is stored on www.keyserver.net ---------------------------------------------