[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2005-12-06 (23:29) |
From: | Jacques Garrigue <garrigue@m...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Module Abbreviations in MLI Files |
From: "David McClain" <dmcclain1@mindspring.com> > I'm a bit rusty writing raw OCaml from scratch, and I ran into syntax errors > this morning whenever I tried to use Module abbreviations, such as > > module T = Types > > in my MLI files. These work just fine in ML files. > > What is the reason for preventing type abbreviations in the interface spec? There is no such thing as "module abbreviations". The above is a module definition: it defines a module T, with the same contents as module Types. A module is a value, and you cannot define values in a signature, only declare them. If you have a signature Types_sig for Types, you might write module T : Types_sig but then you would have to include an implementation in the module. Jacques