[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | William Lovas <wlovas@s...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Coinductive semantics |
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 01:22:37AM +1100, skaller wrote: > On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 13:58 +0100, Hendrik Tews wrote: > > Looking at an object through a mirror you see precisely what you > > can see looking at the object itself. > > Perhaps my analysis is naive. But consider a simpler case > of products and sums. They're dual concepts, are they not? A thought: products and sums are duals, classically, but not intuitionistically. Since O'Caml lacks classical control constructs like callcc, there's no redundancy having both products and sums: neither is representable solely using the other. Also, O'Caml's datatypes are much more than just sums: they also include recursive types, polymorphism, pattern matching, and a degree of abstraction. cheers, William