Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
Associativity of new operators
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2006-01-20 (16:18)
From: David MENTRE <david.mentre@g...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Associativity of new operators
2006/1/20, Alessandro Baretta <>:
> The above toplevel session shows that the associativity of newly defined
> operators depends on the name of the operator itself. Is there a general rule to
> determine the associativity of the operator?

Yep, the first letter of the operator determines its associativity.

The table below shows the relative precedences and associativity of
operators and non-closed constructions. [...] For infix and prefix
symbols, we write "*..." to mean "any symbol starting with *".

Best wishes,