Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
Associativity of new operators
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: William D. Neumann <wneumann@c...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Associativity of new operators
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Alessandro Baretta wrote:

> The above toplevel session shows that the associativity of newly defined 
> operators depends on the name of the operator itself. Is there a general rule 
> to determine the associativity of the operator?

I believe this is covered in section 6.7 of the manual.

William D. Neumann

---

"There's just so many extra children, we could just feed the
children to these tigers.  We don't need them, we're not doing 
anything with them.

Tigers are noble and sleek; children are loud and messy."

         -- Neko Case

Life is unfair.  Kill yourself or get over it.
 	-- Black Box Recorder