Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
Associativity of new operators
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: William D. Neumann <wneumann@c...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Associativity of new operators
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Alessandro Baretta wrote:

> The above toplevel session shows that the associativity of newly defined 
> operators depends on the name of the operator itself. Is there a general rule 
> to determine the associativity of the operator?

I believe this is covered in section 6.7 of the manual.

William D. Neumann


"There's just so many extra children, we could just feed the
children to these tigers.  We don't need them, we're not doing 
anything with them.

Tigers are noble and sleek; children are loud and messy."

         -- Neko Case

Life is unfair.  Kill yourself or get over it.
 	-- Black Box Recorder